On 2026-Jun-18, Nathan Bossart wrote: > On Thu, Jun 18, 2026 at 11:33:23AM +0000, Hans Buschmann wrote: > > I also can confirm that this silences the compiler warning of GCC 16.1.1. > > Thanks! I'm debating whether to back-patch this to unsupported branches. > IIUC it qualifies. I'm getting ready to bump up the minimum supported > version of pg_dump and friends to v10, so maybe I should stop there. But > also, stopping at v14 might be good enough for something small like this. > Any opinions?
I'd stop at 14 and call it a day. It doesn't prevent building, which is IIRC the criteria we use for the older branches. -- Álvaro Herrera PostgreSQL Developer — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/ "You're _really_ hosed if the person doing the hiring doesn't understand relational systems: you end up with a whole raft of programmers, none of whom has had a Date with the clue stick." (Andrew Sullivan) https://postgr.es/m/[email protected]
