Re: synchronized_standby_slots behavior inconsistent with quorum-based synchronous replication

[Ashutosh Sharma]

Hi,

On Tue, Jun 16, 2026 at 12:09 PM Shlok Kyal <shlok.kyal....@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I checked the CFbot and saw the test was failing [1].
>
> It is failing for the test:
> not ok 4     - guc_privs                                 171 ms
>

Thanks for reporting this. The attached patches address the issue and
also incorporate the feedback from Shevta in [1].

[1] - 
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAJpy0uCKaqD-UfCX%3DQ5WkdtxUS8ZCJwLduegi5Etdx7gkV-02g%40mail.gmail.com

--
With Regards,
Ashutosh Sharma.

0003-Add-FIRST-N-and-N-.-priority-syntax-to-synchronized_.patch
Description: Binary data

0002-Add-ANY-N-semantics-to-synchronized_standby_slots.patch
Description: Binary data

0001-Refactor-syncrep-parsing-to-represent-bare-standby-l.patch
Description: Binary data