On 28/09/2018 09:35, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >> That's certainly a good argument. Note that if we implemented that the >> transaction timestamp is advanced inside procedures, that would also >> mean that the transaction timestamp as observed in pg_stat_activity >> would move during VACUUM, for example. That might or might not be >> desirable. > > Attached is a rough implementation. > > I'd be mildly in favor of doing this, but we have mentioned tradeoffs in > this thread.
So do we want to do this or not? -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
