On Mon, May 25, 2026 at 05:30:25PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > Surprising it is. I'll double-check tomorrow. Thanks.
The test on HEAD was a bit incorrect; it included three checks based on offsets that did not make sense as the value is not reported in the function. I guess that this was just an incorrect rebase, that we've missed when the patch got merged. There was also a typo in the test, which I have fixed while on it. Done as of 6aa26be288fa. Thanks. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
