On Sun, May 24, 2026 at 12:29 AM SATYANARAYANA NARLAPURAM < [email protected]> wrote:
> Hi > > On Fri, May 1, 2026 at 12:21 PM Andrew Dunstan <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> >> >> On Wed, Apr 22, 2026 at 12:27 AM Nishant Sharma < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Thanks Shruthi! >>> >>> v5 code, v4_test and v4_test_15 patches look good to me. >>> >>> I checked ECPG regression on master, REL_18, REL_17, REL_16, REL_15, >>> REL_14 using both make and meson. >>> >>> I have finished my review work on the patches. Thank you! >>> >>> >>> >>> >> Thanks, everybody, pushed (as combined patches) >> > > Looks like this committed a case, attached a patch to fix this. > > Thanks, > Satya > > Thanks Satya for looking into this. However, we don't need to add the validation here because the caller ecpg_do_prologue*()* has already taken care of it. Adding it again would be redundant. What do you think? Thanks & Regards, Shruthi K C EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
