On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 01:20:49PM +0200, Fabien COELHO wrote: > So, am I right to deducing that you are satisfied with the current status of > the patch, with the nbits implementation either based on popcount (v4) or > clz (v5) compiler intrinsics? I think that the clz option is better.
Fabien, please note that v5 does not apply, so I moved this patch to next CF, waiting on author. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
