On Sun, Sep 30, 2018 at 10:59:20PM +0200, Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote: > Without further ado, I present a patch to implement pg_ls_archive_status(), > which fills this gap. I believe the function name is long enough and we > don't need an extra wal in there. The patch is based on a very recent > master (just pulled and merged), but does not include the catversion > bump (avoid conflict on merge).
Okay, could you add this patch to the next commit fest? Here it is: https://commitfest.postgresql.org/20/ -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
