> On Apr 10, 2026, at 22:17, Fujii Masao <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 10, 2026 at 4:07 PM Chao Li <[email protected]> wrote: >> PFA v2 - updated header comment of walreceive.c. I tried to avoid mentioning >> the exact exit value in the comment, so I just changed “exit(0)” to >> “terminate”. > > Thanks for updating the patch! > > "termination instructs XXX to terminate" sounds a bit redundant. How > about saying > "to ereport(FATAL)" instead of “to terminate”? > > Regards, > > > -- > Fujii Masao
Okay, yes, that was a bit redundant. I changed it to “to ereport(FATAL)” in v3. After that change, the line went over 80 columns, so I also adjusted a few nearby lines to keep everything within the 80-column limit. There is no content change. Best regards, -- Chao Li (Evan) HighGo Software Co., Ltd. https://www.highgo.com/
v3-0001-Use-proc_exit-in-WalRcvWaitForStartPosition.patch
Description: Binary data
