Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes:
> On 2018-09-26 19:45:07 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> No, there are no additional layers that weren't there before ---
>> snprintf.c's snprintf() slots in directly where the platform's did before.
> Hm? What I mean is that we can't realistically be faster with the
> current architecture, because for floating point we end up doing glibc
> sprintf() in either case.
Oh, you mean specifically for the float conversion case. I still say
that I will *not* accept judging this code solely on the float case.
The string and integer cases are at least as important if not more so.
>> Interesting. strfromd() is a glibc-ism, and a fairly recent one at
>> that (my RHEL6 box doesn't seem to have it).
> It's C99 afaict.
It's not in POSIX 2008, and I don't see it in my admittedly-draft
copy of C99 either. But that's not real relevant -- I don't see
much reason not to use it if we want a quick and dirty answer for
the platforms that have it.
If we had more ambition, we might consider stealing the float
conversion logic out of the "stb" library that Alexander pointed
to upthread. It says it's public domain, so there's no license
impediment to borrowing some code ...
regards, tom lane
