On 09/21/2018 01:51 PM, Joe Conway wrote: > On 09/19/2018 11:18 AM, Joe Conway wrote: >> On 09/19/2018 10:54 AM, Tom Lane wrote: >>> So maybe what we really need is a table of operators not functions. >> >> Good idea -- I will take a look at that. >> >>> However, I don't object to documenting any function that has its >>> own pg_description string. > > Ok, so the attached version refactors/splits the group into two tables > -- operators and functions.
<snip> > I also included John Naylor's patch with some minor editorialization. > > Any further comments or complaints? Having seen none, committed/pushed. This did not seem worth back-patching, so I only pushed to master. Joe -- Crunchy Data - http://crunchydata.com PostgreSQL Support for Secure Enterprises Consulting, Training, & Open Source Development
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
