>> I dislike the existing "pg_stats.tablename", since this can also be an
>> expression index.
>> "pg_stats.relation" with a description of "Name of table or index" is
>> more appropriate.
>> It is a change that we can possibly make in a major version. Looked
>> through the archives,
>> and did not see this being reported/discussed.
>
>
> I don't see it changing in any version, minor or major.
This could be a separate discussion as it's not the fault of this patch,
but clearly "tablename" is not correct here.
>> I noticed in other pg_fatal messages, we include OIDs
>>
>> pg_fatal("could not find function definition for function
>> with OID %u",
>> cast->castfunc);
>>
>> Should we do the same here?
>
>
> If I had the oid, I wouldn't have the error. :)
oops, you're right.
I noticed that you changed the tests to selecting individual columns. I am
not clear as to why this is better?
-SELECT *
+SELECT schemaname, tablename, attname, attnum, inherited, null_frac, avg_width,
+ n_distinct, most_common_vals, most_common_freqs, histogram_bounds,
+ correlation, most_common_elems, most_common_elem_freqs,
+ elem_count_histogram, range_length_histogram, range_empty_frac,
+ range_bounds_histogram
Otherwise v2 LGTM.
--
Sami Imseih
Amazon Web Services (AWS)
