On Thu, 13 Sep 2018 17:03:28 +0900
Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote:

> On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 03:47:26PM +0900, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
> > Anyway, considering it's a static function, chance of breaking
> > backward compatibility is minimum, I think.
> > 
> > So +1 to remove the unused argument.
> 
> Same opinion and arguments here, so I have committed the patch.

Thanks!

-- 
Yugo Nagata <nag...@sraoss.co.jp>

Reply via email to