po 17. 9. 2018 v 18:24 odesÃlatel Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> napsal:
> "Jonathan S. Katz" <jk...@postgresql.org> writes: > > Just to chime in real quick: from the perspective of the RMT we did not > > look at these as a series of "right/wrong" options but what would make > > the most sense for the v11 release so the community could continue to > > improve support for stored procedures and make it easier for users to > > work with them going forward. > > Yeah. I think the real options we had here were: > > 1. Ship v11 with CALL as it stands, try to improve going forward. > 2. Delay v11 for months while we figure out something better. > 3. Remove CALL from v11, try again in v12. > > Neither #2 nor #3 are at all attractive. > > People will need to realize that CALL behavior is still a work in > progress. That may mean that JDBC etc shouldn't try to support it > yet, which isn't great, but none of the above options would have > led to near-term support of CALL in JDBC ... > +1 Pavel > regards, tom lane > >
