On Wed, Jan 21, 2026 at 03:09:30PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Julien Rouhaud <[email protected]> writes: > > On Tue, Jan 20, 2026 at 01:31:53PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > >> So, nobody's actually spoken against this change. I think we should > >> go forward with it, for the reasons I gave at the top of the thread > >> and because "if not now, when?". I have little doubt that if there > >> is anyone still running with standard_conforming_strings = off, they > >> aren't going to change until forced to. So unless we want to live > >> with the potential security hazard forever, we're going to have to > >> make a breaking change sometime. > > > +1 from me. All of that is sensible, plus from an extension point of view > > it's > > easy to write code that is broken with standard_conforming_strings = off so > > it's one less thing to worry about. > > Pushed.
Great, thanks. -- Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> https://momjian.us EDB https://enterprisedb.com Do not let urgent matters crowd out time for investment in the future.
