On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 05:36:31PM +0900, Masahiko Sawada wrote: > It would be useful if we have a number of the options autovacuum > workers could use but since there are only 2 I'm not sure we need the > list-style.
Looking at what Sergei has proposed upthread again, using a comma-separated list of options may be more painful for translators as such lists really depend on the language, so I would be fine to commit what has been added. One last point though: we use anti-wraparound in already five places in the docs, still I have sympathy for "to prevent wraparound" as well. The brackets look rather useless to me, wouldn't it be better to remove them? By doing so the longest message becomes: "automatic aggressive vacuum to prevent wraparound of table blah.blah" -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
