> > Neat! In case it helps, you may also be interested in my (now very out > of date) mails at [1] and [2]. >
Thanks for the pointers! I'll definitely dig into those threads. > At one point I was also working on an independent implementation of > the preferment rules, to make it easier for developers to intuit how > matches were made, but I can't find that email at the moment. This may > have some overlap with "state visualization" for the engine? I have a > 3k-line patch based on top of v22 of the patchset as of September > 2024, if there is interest in that, but no promises on quality -- I > would have posted it if I thought it was ready for review :D > I'd definitely be interested in seeing it, rough edges and all. I haven't tackled the PostgreSQL integration design yet, so understanding how preferment rules map to the existing infrastructure would be very helpful. (Tatsuo found that email, by the way.) > > Thanks, > --Jacob > > [1] > https://postgr.es/m/96b4d3c8-1415-04db-5629-d2617ac7a156%40timescale.com > [2] > https://postgr.es/m/CAGu%3Du8gcyAQAsDLp-01R21%3DM4bpAiGP9PZz0OyiMo5_bM30PMA%40mail.gmail.com Best regards, Henson
