On 31.12.25 11:13, Chao Li wrote:


On Dec 31, 2025, at 18:04, Kirill Reshke <[email protected]> wrote:

On Wed, 31 Dec 2025 at 13:16, Chao Li <[email protected]> wrote:

Hi Hackers,

While reviewing a separate patch related to nbtree, I noticed that 
_bt_setup_array_cmp in nbtpreprocesskeys.c performs multiple redundant lookups of the 
operator family OID via rel->rd_opfamily[skey->sk_attno - 1].

The attached patch caches this value in a local opfamily variable. This matches 
the pattern used in several other functions within the same file (such as 
_bt_skiparray_strat_decrement, _bt_preprocess_array_keys, etc.), making the 
code more consistent and readable.

The assignment is placed after the early-return check for (elemtype == 
opcintype) to ensure we only perform the array indexing when the cross-type 
comparison logic is actually reached.

Best regards,
--
Chao Li (Evan)
HighGo Software Co., Ltd.
https://www.highgo.com/



Hi!
We do not cache anything here, this is just a refactoring for nbtree internals?


Yes, just cache  rel->rd_opfamily[skey->sk_attno - 1] into a local variable.

But that's not caching, at least in a compiled language with an optimizing compiler.

Are you claiming that this has a performance impact, or that it makes the code easier to understand, or something else? The patch isn't necessarily wrong, but a clear description of the motivation would be good.



Reply via email to