Re: Implement waiting for wal lsn replay: reloaded

[Chao Li]

> On Dec 30, 2025, at 11:14, Álvaro Herrera <alvhe...@kurilemu.de> wrote:
> 
> On 2025-Dec-27, Xuneng Zhou wrote:
> 
>> On Fri, Dec 26, 2025 at 4:25 PM Chao Li <li.evan.c...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>>> 2 - 0002
>>> ```
>>> +                       else
>>> +                               ereport(ERROR,
>>> +                                               
>>> (errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE),
>>> +                                                errmsg("unrecognized value 
>>> for WAIT option \"%s\": \"%s\"",
>>> +                                                               "MODE", 
>>> mode_str),
>>> ```
>>> 
>>> I wonder why don’t we directly put MODE into the error message?
>> 
>> Yeah, putting MODE into the error message is cleaner. It's done in v8.
> 
> The reason not to do that (and also put WAIT in a separate string) is so
> that the message is identicla to other messages and thus requires no
> separate translation, specifically
>  errmsg("unrecognized value for %s option \"%s\": \"%s\"", ...)
> 
> See commit 502e256f2262.  Please use that form.
> 

To follow 502e256f2262, it should use “%s” for “WAIT” as well. I raised the 
comment because I saw “WAIT” is the format strings, thus “MODE” can be there as 
well.

So, we should do a similar change like:
```
-                                                errmsg("unrecognized value for 
EXPLAIN option \"%s\": \"%s\"",
-                                                               opt->defname, 
p),
+                                                errmsg("unrecognized value for 
%s option \"%s\": \"%s\"",
+                                                               "EXPLAIN", 
opt->defname, p),
```

Best regards,
--
Chao Li (Evan)
HighGo Software Co., Ltd.
https://www.highgo.com/