> Personally I would go with either (a) or (c), and I was planning to > clean up / improve / share my (c) patch as a second attempt for this > thread, if it didn't receive any replies. I can still do that, so that > we have multiple test implementations.
I attached the patch. It modifies one of the existing oauth_validator tests to showcase how it works, but in theory it isn't dependent on oauth. It however requires shared_preload_libraries (that is common for all options), maybe oauth_validator_libraries could imply that?
0001-Adding-hooks-to-HBA-parsing-option-c.patch
Description: Binary data
