On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 07:56:00AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > As this is a data corruption issue, are there any objections if I patch > and back-patch? I also would like to get this stuff in first as I have > other refactoring work which would shave some more code.
I looked at this patch again after letting it aside for a couple of weeks and pushed it. This is a potential, very rare data loss bug, and nobody complained about it so I have not done any back-patch. Please let me know if you would like to see something happen in stable branches as well. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
