On Wednesday, December 10, 2025 16:28 MSK, Heikki Linnakangas <[email protected]> wrote: > This seems a little pointless because the test explicitly sets > max_connectins and max_wal_senders. It's true that it currently uses > more iterations than strictly necessary, but does it matter?
Sure, currently the test works fine. But if we exactly know that the pool size is '2*(MaxConnections + max_wal_senders)' why we do not apply it to the test? The additional benefit is if someone increase the pool size for instance '2*(MaxConnections + max_wal_senders) + some_value' the test fails and indicates an issue. -- Alexander
