> On Dec 12, 2025, at 07:12, Jacob Champion <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 11, 2025 at 12:22 PM Peter Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Why not just say clearly what the default value is?
>>>
>>> PSA: a patch to do that.
>
> LGTM. (In fact I've read that paragraph three times and still cannot
> get it to stick in my head, despite having done a fair amount of
> thinking about publish_via_partition_root, so if you have further
> improvement ideas I'm all ears.)
>
> --Jacob
>
>
My feeling is that the preceding long sentence has described both sides expect
explicitly mentioning true and false, which makes the following sentence, no
matter the original version and the patched version sounds slightly redundant.
So I think maybe we can rework the entire paragraph like:
```
This parameter controls how changes to a partitioned table (or any of its
partitions) are published. When set to true, changes are published using the
identity and schema of the partitioned table. When set to false (the default),
changes are published using the identity and schema of the individual partitions
where the changes actually occurred. Enabling this option allows the changes to
be replicated into a non-partitioned table or into a partitioned table whose
partition structure differs from that of the publisher.
```
Best regards,
--
Chao Li (Evan)
HighGo Software Co., Ltd.
https://www.highgo.com/
