On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 12:16:00AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> writes: >> Does anybody else have any idea on how can we write a test for >> non-default block size or if we already have anything similar? > > Build with a non-default BLCKSZ and see if the regression tests pass. > There's no way that a build with BLCKSZ x can run any tests for > BLCKSZ y.
Or we could implement block-level configuration at initdb time? That's what Andres has done for WAL segment size recently. /me hides and runs fast > Note that you can expect some plan variations from a different BLCKSZ, > so there'd be at least a few "failures" in the regression tests, which'd > require manual inspection. Otherwise this could be delegated to a > buildfarm animal using a nonstandard BLCKSZ. Last time I did that I saw only plan diffs, which was a couple of weeks ago. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
