> Finally, the consts are non-appealing for me for functions that are > internally used in these files.
I'm curious why you find them non-appealing for non-exposed functions, if you have time to elaborate. > And forgot one: > valid_subsequent_attnum()'s duplication is actually adapted IMO, the > argument lists could have different assumptions depending on the type > of extended stats we are dealing with. Yeah, I saw that, reviewing the diff-of-diffs just now.
