Hi,

> > Personally I don't think this is a good change.
>
> Only this one (because maybe databuf is used twice) or the whole idea of 
> 7f798aca1d5
> and this patch?

The whole idea to be honest. This being said, this is just my personal
opinion as of today. The majority of the community may disagree and/or
have good arguments to do this I'm not aware of or failed to
understand and/or just have other sense of beauty. And that's OK. IMO
what actually is important is for the code to be consistent. That's as
I understand what your patch is trying to accomplish.

Let's see what other people think.

-- 
Best regards,
Aleksander Alekseev


Reply via email to