Hi John! On 15.11.2025 03:47, John Naylor wrote: > On Sat, Nov 15, 2025 at 1:05 AM David Geier <[email protected]> wrote: >> I understand that you want to make progress with the use case at hand >> but I feel like we're missing out on a lot of opportunity where the >> introduced code would also be very beneficial. > > The patch is independently beneficial, but is also just a stepping > stone toward something larger, and I don't yet know exactly how it's > going to look. Premature abstractions are just going to get in the > way. I'd be open to hear proposals for possible wider application > after the dust settles, but that's not going to happen during the PG19 > cycle. >
That sounds like a good compromise. Let's see what else can profit from the new sorting code once we've got the tuple sort in. -- David Geier
