> On Nov 13, 2025, at 11:42, Amit Kapila <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> On Thu, Nov 13, 2025 at 4:31 AM Peter Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> CURRENT
>> seq_sync_error_count
>> sync_error_count
>> 
>> MY SUGGESTION
>> sync_seq_error_count
>> sync_table_error_count
>> 
> 
> +1. Along with consistency with other column names, it will also make
> it easier for users to group and query all 'sync' related counts
> together.
> 

+1. A common prefix looks good and brings benefits such as what Amit mentioned.

Best regards,
--
Chao Li (Evan)
HighGo Software Co., Ltd.
https://www.highgo.com/






Reply via email to