Jacob Champion <[email protected]> writes:
> On Tue, Nov 4, 2025 at 5:19 PM Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Assuming that works for Emmanuel, we could wrap it in a
>> pg_disable_sanitizer_instrumentation macro, or just use it
>> as-is. I don't have a strong preference --- any thoughts?
> No preference on my end. (If a second place to use it pops up, we
> could wrap it then.)
Yeah, that's what I concluded after sleeping on it. Right now
it seems unlikely that there will be more usages, so adding a
macro in c.h would just slow down the build (admittedly only
microscopically) for no gain. If we find additional usages
then we can revisit that tradeoff.
regards, tom lane
