Hi! On Mon, Nov 3, 2025 at 5:13 PM Andres Freund <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2025-11-03 16:06:58 +0100, Álvaro Herrera wrote: > > On 2025-Nov-03, Alexander Korotkov wrote: > > > > > I'd like to give this subject another chance for pg19. I'm going to > > > push this if no objections. > > > > Sure. I don't understand why patches 0002 and 0003 are separate though. > > FWIW, I appreciate such splits. Even if the functionality isn't usable > independently, it's still different type of code that's affected. And the > patches are each big enough to make that worthwhile for easier review.
Thank you for the feedback, pushed. > One thing that'd be nice to do once we have WAIT FOR is to make the common > case of wait_for_catchup() use this facility, instead of polling... The draft patch for that is attached. WAIT FOR doesn't handle all the possible use cases of wait_for_catchup(), but I've added usage when it's appropriate. ------ Regards, Alexander Korotkov Supabase
v1-0001-Use-WAIT-FOR-LSN-in-PostgreSQL-Test-Cluster-wait_.patch
Description: Binary data
