Robert Treat <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Tue, Nov 4, 2025 at 9:48 PM jian he <[email protected]> wrote:

> > what the expectation of
> > pg_repackdb --index=index_name, the doc is not very helpful.
> >
> > pg_repackdb --analyze --index=zz --verbose
> > pg_repackdb: repacking database "src3"
> > pg_repackdb: error: processing of database "src3" failed: ERROR:  "zz"
> > is not an index for table "tenk1"
> >
> > select pg_get_indexdef ('zz'::regclass);
> >                   pg_get_indexdef
> > ---------------------------------------------------
> >  CREATE INDEX zz ON public.tenk2 USING btree (two)
> >
> 
> Hmm... yes, this is a bit confusing. I didn't verify it in the code,
> but from memory I think the --index option is meant to be used only in
> conjunction with --table, in which case it would repack the table
> using the specified index. I could be overlooking something though.

The corresponding code is:

+       /*
+        * In REPACK mode, if the 'using_index' option was given but no index
+        * name, filter only tables that have an index with indisclustered set.
+        * (If an index name is given, we trust the user to pass a reasonable 
list
+        * of tables.)
+        *
+        * XXX it may be worth printing an error if an index name is given with 
no
+        * list of tables.
+        */
+       if (vacopts->mode == MODE_REPACK &&
+               vacopts->using_index && !vacopts->indexname)
+       {
+               appendPQExpBufferStr(&catalog_query,
+                                                        " AND EXISTS (SELECT 1 
FROM pg_catalog.pg_index\n"
+                                                        "    WHERE indrelid = 
c.oid AND indisclustered)\n");
+       }

I'm not sure if it's worth allowing the --index option to have an
argument. Since the user can specify multiple tables, he should also be able
to specify multiple indexes. And then the question would be: what should
happen if the user forgot to specify (or just mistyped) the index name for a
table which does not yet have the clustering index set? Skip that table (and
print out a warning)? Or consider it an error?

-- 
Antonin Houska
Web: https://www.cybertec-postgresql.com


Reply via email to