On Sat, 1 Nov 2025 at 14:19, Corey Huinker <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> which might be a more realistic thing if the query without the WHERE >> clause was part of a VIEW. However, we don't currently have any >> infrastructure to detect when a column *is* NULL. There's only the >> opposite with expr_is_nonnullable() or var_is_nonnullable(). > > But we'd still catch NULL constants, yes?
Yes. It could. I've left that part of the patch #ifdef'd out. I wasn't planning on using it. I just left it there as an example for if someone wanted to test it. > The change is a big win for clarity. Applies clean. Passes. Thanks for checking. David
