On Sat, Nov 1, 2025 at 5:55 PM Paul Ohlhauser <[email protected]> wrote: > > Did my previous two messages make sense to you guys?
More or less, but to move things forward I think you're going to need to prune the proposal. The attached patch is probably not going to be accepted in its current form. My $0.02: of your numbered solutions, 1) (update the message to match reality) seems to have consensus, 2) (switch from warning to error) might be workable as an alternative -- I'm +0.5 now; doesn't look like anyone's really "against" it yet, and 3) (allow group permissions) needs more supporting evidence before it's likely to get interest. --Jacob
