Hi, > How about a simpler injection_points_attach(point_name text, func > text, module text) with a second SQL function, but a different number > of arguments? Using a new hardcoded action for this purpose is > confusing as your point is to introduce a SQL wrapper on top of > InjectionPointAttach(), and using input arguments that match with the > C function is an attractive option.
Thank you for the suggestion. I agree that having a separate SQL function for this would make the design easier to understand. Please find attached a patch that implements this. Thank you, Rahila Syed
v2-0001-Overload-the-injection_points_attach-sql-function.patch
Description: Binary data
