On Fri, Aug 22, 2025 at 07:46:43PM -0400, Andres Freund wrote: > That would be the easiest fix - but I'm starting to wonder if it shouldn't > just be its own test module, as annoying as the boilerplate for that is. > > While the test improved code coverage for the various indexes noticeably, I > did subsequently realize that the new test doesn't end up testing the recovery > path :(. Better than nothing, but having any coverage of those paths might be > worth the boilerplate and the runtime overhead of a test module :/
Adding just an EXTRA_INSTALL to isolation's Makefile would not work, no? This Makefile has its own rules, which implies that fixing this issue would be to duplicate what EXTRA_INSTALL does if we don't use the test module solution. How about a new test/modules/gist/ then? -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
