Hi Sergey, > It seems that bytea is your personal interest, since you continue to impose > your bytea when a better solution has already been found with uuid_encode() > and uuid_decode().
In the previous messages Masahiko Sawada wrote: > Or providing > 'uuid_encode(uuid, format text) -> text' and 'uuid_decode(text, format > text) -> uuid' might make sense too, but I'm not sure. I'd like to > hear opinions from other hackers too. I merely shared my personal opinion on why I think this is a bad idea. Let's see what other people think. -- Best regards, Aleksander Alekseev
