On Sat, Oct 25, 2025 at 6:46 AM Michael Paquier <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 24, 2025 at 05:51:54PM +0530, Srinath Reddy Sadipiralla wrote: > > - * These files exist on the source and the target services, so > they > > should > > + * These files exist on the source and the target servers, so > they > > should > > Not sure what my fingers were doing here. > > > I think as we are not using mtime to show that the file has not been > copied > > and been skipped ,instead we are doing the same with the debug message > > (qr/pg_wal\/$wal_seg_skipped \(NONE\)/,), so stat calculation of this WAL > > segment can be removed. > > Yes, removing this one makes sense. > > And, to keep it short: applied. > Thanks Michael. -- Thanks, Srinath Reddy Sadipiralla EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com/
