> On 24 Oct 2025, at 08:51, Michael Paquier <[email protected]> wrote:
> in light of 1c6d4629394d, we should not require that, and the > CI looks happy with the attached. +1, a nice win in terms of readability. -- Daniel Gustafsson
> On 24 Oct 2025, at 08:51, Michael Paquier <[email protected]> wrote:
> in light of 1c6d4629394d, we should not require that, and the > CI looks happy with the attached. +1, a nice win in terms of readability. -- Daniel Gustafsson