On Tue, Oct 21, 2025 at 2:11 AM Robert Haas <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 20, 2025 at 3:20 AM Peter Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > > Do you have thoughts about the patch? > > I agree with the rationale that Ashutosh states but I don't see a > strong need to patch the code to make this a 100% invariable rule. (Of > course, someone else may disagree, which is fine.) >
In case it makes any difference... The codebase already follows this rule in 95% of cases. The patch simply corrects a couple of inconsistencies that appeared to be accidental oversights. ====== Kind Regards, Peter Smith Fujitsu Australia
