On Oct 6, 2025, at 06:30, Michael Paquier <[email protected]> wrote:
> IMO, the main docs would benefit greatly from the addition of > PG_ABS_BUILDDIR, PG_ABS_BUILDDIR, PG_LIBDIR and PG_DLSUFFIX, which are > still missing. These are available to extension developers through > installcheck, and are a great way to write more flexible tests with > arbitrary inputs, like a dependency to on-disk files. I would > certainly +1 this addition, at least. I’ve never heard of these! Seems like there’s an awful lot of stuff in the testing infrastructure that would be useful to document. D
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
