On 08/29/18 18:51, Tom Lane wrote: > As against that, of course, explicitly zeroing fields that you know very > well are already zero eats some cycles. I've occasionally wondered if
I haven't checked what a smart C99 compiler actually emits for a designated initializer giving a field a compile-time known constant zero. Is it sure to eat any more cycles than the same initializer with the field unmentioned? -Chap
