On Fri, Oct 10, 2025 at 09:33:10AM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > Great, I think this is a definite improvement. I saw someone recently > complaining about this overuse of ok(), so thanks for doing the work to > improve it.
Yeah, it's really cool to see someone step up and do all this leg work for the existing code. I have not checked the patch in details or if there are missing spots. Andrew, is that something you are planning to do? -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
