Hi, Thanks for your detailed reply. > I think that we could get rid of the initial_restart_lsn and just use > s->data.restart_lsn here (while keeping initial xmin ones to preserve the > intent of 818fefd8fd4 for those). I agree with your proposed change. > Your concern is only about the restart_lsn, right? (asking because I don't > think > it's safe not to rely on the initial_* for the xmin ones, see [1]). My primary concern is indeed the restart_lsn issue, and thanks again for the clear explanation. Best regards, suyu.cmj
- Question about InvalidatePossiblyObsoleteSlot() suyu.cmj
- Re: Question about InvalidatePossiblyObsoleteSlot() Bertrand Drouvot
- Re: Question about InvalidatePossiblyObsoleteSlo... suyu.cmj
- Re: Question about InvalidatePossiblyObsolet... Bertrand Drouvot
- Re: Question about InvalidatePossiblyObs... suyu.cmj
- Re: Question about InvalidatePossiblyObs... Masahiko Sawada
- Re: Question about InvalidatePossib... Bertrand Drouvot
- Re: Question about InvalidatePo... Masahiko Sawada
- Re: Question about Invalida... Bertrand Drouvot
- Re: Question about Invalida... Masahiko Sawada
- Re: Question about Invalida... Bertrand Drouvot
- Re: Question about Invalida... Masahiko Sawada
- Re: Question about Invalida... Bertrand Drouvot
- Re: Question about Invalida... Amit Kapila
- Re: Question about Invalida... Bertrand Drouvot
