On Friday, September 26, 2025, Vladlen Popolitov <[email protected]> wrote:
> > It looks like sleep has the wrong place in a function. It should be > an utility command, that does not start a transaction. > Then write that command. We’re not going to change pg_sleep. It’s works just as advertised. True, it probably should never be used in production. I can see a pipeline sequence tossing a wait command into the flow so having the server accept a wait instruction has at least some immediate merit. David J.
