> On Sep 25, 2025, at 17:54, Daniel Gustafsson <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 25 Sep 2025, at 10:01, Chao Li <[email protected]> wrote: > >> There are 5 different cases, showing that there is not a unique way for what >> function name should be put to xxInternal() functions’ comment. >> >> Is it deserve to take this opportunity to make all of them in a consistent >> format? > > We don't have a policy on how to do function comments, and none of these > examples strike me as particularly confusing. I don't think there is much > value in the churn from changing these from one flavor or another as they > aren't wrong. >
Sure, then I withdraw the patch. Thank you very much for helping. Best regards, -- Chao Li (Evan) HighGo Software Co., Ltd. https://www.highgo.com/
