Hello, I was working on my own patch for the same thing, until I found this was already there. I think this would be very useful for a lot of people. Do you need any help moving this forward Anderas? I have both tests and docs written, although not for the FOR UPDATE part.
> On 25 Jun 2025, at 13:39, Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rash...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, 12 May 2025 at 19:33, Andreas Karlsson <andr...@proxel.se> wrote: >> >> I have fixed that one and some other issues locally and will submit a >> new version in a while after I have added more tests because you are >> very correct in that a big issue with my last version of the patch was >> the big lack of tests and lack of making sure all features which >> interact with UPSERT actually worked with my changes. Plus some islation >> tests would be nice to have. >> > > +1. Don't forget to move the CF entry to the next open CF. > > FYI, over on [1] I proposed more tests and doc updates for RLS. I > think those updates might make it easier to test and document the RLS > aspects of this patch. > > [1] > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CAEZATCWqnfeChjK=n1v_dyzt4rt4mnq+ybf9c0qxdytvmsy...@mail.gmail.com > > Regards, > Dean > > >
