On Mon, Aug 25, 2025 at 04:37:21PM -0500, Sami Imseih wrote: > When we lookup from shared array only, we need to take a shared lock > every lookup. Acquiring that lock is what I am trying to avoid. You > are saying it's not worth optimizing that part, correct?
Why do we need a shared lock here? IIUC there's no chance that existing entries will change. We'll only ever add new ones to the end. -- nathan
