Dear Michael and hackers,

This is a wrap-up of this thread. I'm planning to close the thread once.

> I am saying that there is little point in having tests for the origin
> functions in single-user mode as these don't do anything really
> fancy with global states (there's a acquired_by of course, and no
> specific IsUnderPostmaster patch), contrary to the replication slots.
> I am not convinced that there is any need to restrict them, either.
> If somebody shows a reason to justify such a move, we could argue
> about it, of course.

OK, thanks for the clarification. Yes, there are no special path for
single-user mode for origins.

Now, senior members recently appeared here are not so motivated to restrict some
operations in single-user mode unless it cannot be done in principle. Based on
that, I decided to close the thread once until someone raised another point.
For the reference purpose, I attached a patch which prohibits slot manipulation
in single-user mode. Anyone can update and use the patch for any purposes.

Best regards,
Hayato Kuroda
FUJITSU LIMITED

Attachment: v8-0001-Prohibit-slot-manipulation-while-in-single-user-m.patch
Description: v8-0001-Prohibit-slot-manipulation-while-in-single-user-m.patch

Reply via email to