> I do not think this is something we ought to consider. It might help > certain corner use-cases, but it's probably a net loss for most. > In particular, I don't think that creating thousands of temp tables in > a session but then touching only a few of them in any one transaction > is a very plausible usage pattern.
Acturely, we just facing such problem in some real systems. More than 3,700 temporary tables created! I accept such case is not that common, but it does exist. Regards, Jet Halo Tech (www.halodbtech.com) openHalo (www.openhalo.org)
