On Thu, Aug 7, 2025 at 3:14 AM Nathan Bossart <nathandboss...@gmail.com> wrote: > I also am leaning towards treating this as v19 material. It's a nontrivial > behavior change, and this option is useful for major version upgrades, > which is an area that we really don't want to surprise users too much.
+1 > Furthermore, auto-analyze doesn't process partitioned tables, either, so > this introduces a bit of divergence. (I'd love to see that project picked > up again someday. Perhaps I will take a gander...) Sounds good! Regards, -- Fujii Masao