On Thu, Aug 7, 2025 at 3:14 AM Nathan Bossart <nathandboss...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I also am leaning towards treating this as v19 material.  It's a nontrivial
> behavior change, and this option is useful for major version upgrades,
> which is an area that we really don't want to surprise users too much.

+1

> Furthermore, auto-analyze doesn't process partitioned tables, either, so
> this introduces a bit of divergence.  (I'd love to see that project picked
> up again someday.  Perhaps I will take a gander...)

Sounds good!

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao


Reply via email to