On Fri, Aug 15, 2025 at 2:33 AM SATYANARAYANA NARLAPURAM <satyanarlapu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Masahiko, > > On Thu, Aug 14, 2025 at 4:57 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.m...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Fri, Aug 8, 2025 at 2:59 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.m...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > On Thu, Jul 31, 2025 at 4:31 PM SATYANARAYANA NARLAPURAM >> > <satyanarlapu...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > > >> > > Please find attached patch that adds CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS while scanning >> > > the buffers in pg_buffercache_pages. I checked other functions in the >> > > module and this check already exists in pg_buffercache_numa_pages. >> > >> > Thank you for the patch! >> > >> > I think the patch is reasonable and it looks good to me. I'll push it >> > to master early next week, barring objections. >> >> After reviewing this patch more, I'm leaning toward to backpatch this >> change. The patch adds CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() to >> pg_buffercache_pages(), pg_buffercache_summary(), and >> pg_buffercache_usage_counts(), and the latter two functions were >> introduced in v16. Therefore, for v15 or older we can add CFI to only >> pg_buffercache_pages() and apply this patch to v16 or newer. Thoughts? > > > Thanks for reviewing the patch. Sounds good to me.
Could you provide patches also for back branches? or shall I? Regards, -- Masahiko Sawada Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
